procedures were mentioned across all ten sites, although the absence of standard
labial hypertrophy,вІ implying that the procedure is used to treat a medical
researchers also analysed the language used, including the use of terms, such
ranging from what and how procedures are carried out, to success rates, and
of the information provided by these websites was assessed using 16 criteria,
Dr Sarah Creighton, UCL Institute for Women's Health
This report highlights significant gaps in the breadth, depth, accuracy and quality of clinical information given by some service providers of female genital cosmetic surgery.
included the first five UK and US websites that came up in the search results.
Googled private providers offering female genital cosmetic surgery, and
well as altering the shape of the external lips (labia) of the vagina.
vaginal rejuvenationвІ and вІ
surgery is available to women who simply donвІ t like the way their genitals
procedure that has come under little scrutiny to date.
that women can make fully informed choices about an increasingly popular
prompt the authors to urge that guidelines be drawn up to improve standards so
published in the obstetrics and gynaecology section of the online journal BMJ
poor,вІ and in some cases, inaccurate, reveals a small study led by academics at the UCL Institute of Women's Health.
of internet information available for women opting for вІ
Web info on 'designer vagina' procedures poor and often inaccurate
Web info on 'designer vagina' procedures poor and often inaccurate
Комментариев нет:
Отправить комментарий